Hi all! I think "sponsored" or "verified" are the best words for our Loco Teams
Sergio Meneses Linux User: #478743 Ubuntu User: #24056 On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Randall Ross <[email protected]> wrote: > On 13-02-06 11:47 PM, YoBoY wrote: > > Le 06/02/2013 20:23, Laura Czajkowski a écrit : > >> > >> status = Verified, Evaluated, Reviewed, Sponsored > >> > > > > Hi, > > > > It's great to see a change on this "approved" status (who just give us > > some CDs and gifts sometimes). I really like the idea. If I have to > > choose one of the proposition, I'll go with the Reviewed. > > > > But, in fact, if I think about it, I would prefer to name the > > "unapproved/unverified/unevaluated/unreviewed/unsponsored" locoteams. > > All the teams are locoteams and should be called that, without a > > status. The unapproved are, for me, just teams who still need advices, > > help, structure,… to fill or surpass the template of a locoteam. To > > resume, if locoteams are Jedis, the unaproved teams are Padawans. I > > can't give proposition, my english vocabulary is too poor for that, > > and it's just my opinion. > > > > Big hug everyone and thanks for all the good work, > > > > YoBoY > > > > > +1 for "Sponsored" > > We should resist the temptation to assume that an "Unapproved" team is > somehow deficient. Some "Unapproved" teams actually have a high level of > activity and organization, and in some cases, other sponsorship models > (even self-sponsorship). > > Cheers, > Randall > > > -- > loco-contacts mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/loco-contacts > >
-- loco-contacts mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/loco-contacts
