A
couple of questions about the SyslogAppender:
- Any
reason for the duplication of HAVE_SYSLOG and LOG4CXX_HAVE_SYSLOG? The
former exists in the makes, the latter is in the sources itself. The
sources used to have HAVE_SYSLOG (e.g. rev. 308539), but it was changed.
- I would
like to use the "local" syslog functionality, so I just #defined
LOG4CXX_HAVE_SYSLOG, and the ::syslog() part was successfully used. I
see that the "non-local" writer is commented – should I be
worried? J
And
another quick one –
- Is
there an existing RPM spec file log4cxx somewhere?
|
- SyslogAppender, RPM Qs: Efri Nattel-Shay
-
