On Mar 9, 2006, at 4:15 AM, Efri Nattel-Shay wrote:
A couple of questions about the SyslogAppender:
Any reason for the duplication of HAVE_SYSLOG and
LOG4CXX_HAVE_SYSLOG? The former exists in the makes, the latter is
in the sources itself. The sources used to have HAVE_SYSLOG (e.g.
rev. 308539), but it was changed
I'll let Andreas answer that one.
.
I would like to use the "local" syslog functionality, so I just
#defined LOG4CXX_HAVE_SYSLOG, and the ::syslog() part was
successfully used. I see that the "non-
local" writer is commented – should I be worried? J
All the existing network stuff needed to be rewritten due to the move
to APR. Looks nobody has taken on that part yet.
And another quick one –
Is there an existing RPM spec file log4cxx somewhere?
I did a private one long time ago, but haven't keep it up to date,
but there has been at least one.