On Mar 9, 2006, at 4:15 AM, Efri Nattel-Shay wrote:

A couple of questions about the SyslogAppender:



Any reason for the duplication of HAVE_SYSLOG and LOG4CXX_HAVE_SYSLOG? The former exists in the makes, the latter is in the sources itself. The sources used to have HAVE_SYSLOG (e.g. rev. 308539), but it was changed

I'll let Andreas answer that one.


.
I would like to use the "local" syslog functionality, so I just #defined LOG4CXX_HAVE_SYSLOG, and the ::syslog() part was successfully used. I see that the "non-
local" writer is commented – should I be worried? J


All the existing network stuff needed to be rewritten due to the move to APR. Looks nobody has taken on that part yet.

And another quick one –

Is there an existing RPM spec file log4cxx somewhere?

I did a private one long time ago, but haven't keep it up to date, but there has been at least one.

Reply via email to