Curt Arnold wrote: > > On Mar 9, 2006, at 4:15 AM, Efri Nattel-Shay wrote: > >> A couple of questions about the SyslogAppender: >> >> >> >> Any reason for the duplication of HAVE_SYSLOG and >> LOG4CXX_HAVE_SYSLOG? The former exists in the makes, the latter is in >> the sources itself. The sources used to have HAVE_SYSLOG (e.g. rev. >> 308539), but it was changed > > > I'll let Andreas answer that one. I have to check it. I remember that I worked on this when I ported the datagram socket to APR, but I dont remember the reason for the modified #define.
>> I would like to use the "local" syslog functionality, so I just >> #defined LOG4CXX_HAVE_SYSLOG, and the ::syslog() part was >> successfully used. I see that the "non- >> local" writer is commented – should I be worried? J See https://issues.apache.org:443/jira/browse/LOGCXX-66 I wanted to continue working on this, once I have committed the stuff which I worked on recently :-) > All the existing network stuff needed to be rewritten due to the move > to APR. Looks nobody has taken on that part yet. > >> And another quick one – >> >> Is there an existing RPM spec file log4cxx somewhere? See also https://issues.apache.org:443/jira/browse/LOGCXX-20 Andreas
