Anders,
Not to quibble but the result was actually 4 committers +1 and 3 users +1 which does
not alter the final outcome of the vote. Formally, only committer votes count. The
committer privilege also grants veto rights.
In any case, welcome Jim! Regards, Ceki
At 14:04 30.05.2001 -0400, you wrote:
>Thanks to everyone for casting their votes. The result was 7 to 0 in
>favor of making Jim a committer and so I've asked the appropriate
>authorities (Brian Behlendorf) to add an account for Jim.
>
>Anders
>
>
>Anders Kristensen wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'd like to propose that Jim is given committer privileges for log4j.
>> He's contributed a number of bug fixes and improvements, has answered
>> questions on log4j-users, and generally demonstrated a good
>> understanding of log4j and commitment to its further development.
>>
>> I'm (obviously) +1.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Anders
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Ceki Gülcü
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
