+1 Not a committer :)
And I fully agree with Mark and find that we should receive this jewel with open arms. Mark> +1 Mark> Not a comitter, but I think this is a great offer that just can't be turned Mark> down. It is a credit to ThoughtWorks that they are considering the donation Mark> of this tool and it's implementation. I have not had a chance to look at Mark> the tool thoroughly, but from the description it appears to be very robust Mark> and mature. Mark> It does seem to me that how the code gets used/integrated needs to be worked Mark> out. As Ceki says, if nothing else it will be an invaluable set of code to Mark> glean from. But I suspect it will be more than that. Mark> -Mark >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Ceki Gülcü [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >> Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 3:22 PM >> To: Log4J Developers List >> Subject: [Vote] LogFactor5 Donation >> >> >> >> Hi all, >> >> Brad Marlborough recently proposed to donate LogFactor5 to >> the log4j project. >> Are we as a community interested in this contribution? >> LogFactor5 seems sexier >> than chainsaw but sex appeal is not everything. On the other hand, >> I am sure there is a lot to lean from studying the code if we >> don't adopt >> lf5 as is. It >> all depends on the developers who assume charge for the gui >> extensions for >> log4j. >> >> Having talked Oliver Burn (the author of chainsaw) on the >> issue, I view the >> donation >> quite favorably. So here is my +1. Oliver? Others? >> >> >> -- >> Ceki >> >> >> -- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: >> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> For additional commands, e-mail: >> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Mark> -- Mark> To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mark> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- Best regards, Max mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
