I agree. +1. Max Rydahl Andersen wrote: > +1 > > Not a committer :) > > And I fully agree with Mark and find that we should receive this jewel > with open arms. > > Mark> +1 > > Mark> Not a comitter, but I think this is a great offer that just can't be turned > Mark> down. It is a credit to ThoughtWorks that they are considering the donation > Mark> of this tool and it's implementation. I have not had a chance to look at > Mark> the tool thoroughly, but from the description it appears to be very robust > Mark> and mature. > > Mark> It does seem to me that how the code gets used/integrated needs to be worked > Mark> out. As Ceki says, if nothing else it will be an invaluable set of code to > Mark> glean from. But I suspect it will be more than that. > > Mark> -Mark > > >>>-----Original Message----- >>>From: Ceki Gülcü [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >>>Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 3:22 PM >>>To: Log4J Developers List >>>Subject: [Vote] LogFactor5 Donation >>> >>> >>> >>>Hi all, >>> >>>Brad Marlborough recently proposed to donate LogFactor5 to >>>the log4j project. >>>Are we as a community interested in this contribution? >>>LogFactor5 seems sexier >>>than chainsaw but sex appeal is not everything. On the other hand, >>>I am sure there is a lot to lean from studying the code if we >>>don't adopt >>>lf5 as is. It >>>all depends on the developers who assume charge for the gui >>>extensions for >>>log4j. >>> >>>Having talked Oliver Burn (the author of chainsaw) on the >>>issue, I view the >>>donation >>>quite favorably. So here is my +1. Oliver? Others? >>> >>> >>>-- >>>Ceki >>> >>> >>>-- >>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: >>><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>For additional commands, e-mail: >>><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> > > Mark> -- > Mark> To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Mark> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >
-- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
