The more the merrier I say :) We then have a choice as to which we use (chainsaw or LF5).
+1 -----Original Message----- From: Ceki Gülcü [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 11 April 2002 23:22 To: Log4J Developers List Subject: [Vote] LogFactor5 Donation Hi all, Brad Marlborough recently proposed to donate LogFactor5 to the log4j project. Are we as a community interested in this contribution? LogFactor5 seems sexier than chainsaw but sex appeal is not everything. On the other hand, I am sure there is a lot to lean from studying the code if we don't adopt lf5 as is. It all depends on the developers who assume charge for the gui extensions for log4j. Having talked Oliver Burn (the author of chainsaw) on the issue, I view the donation quite favorably. So here is my +1. Oliver? Others? -- Ceki -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
