Raghu, Kevin can comment, but as far as I know there are no current plans to absorb his CompositeRollingAppender class into the "official" set of log4j classes for the next release. If you feel that it is that useful, then it can certainly be looked at.
Do you want to champion its inclusion? I don't think there is a formal procedure, though Ceki can comment on that. I think you just have to make a convincing enough case that it is needed/useful. What functionality does it provide, what hole/need does it fill? Then a convinced committer needs to commit the changes to the log4j cvs (Kevin is not currently listed as a committer, but then neither am I...:-). Developing some matching test cases is helpful in convincing folks, I might add. -Mark > -----Original Message----- > From: Havaldar, Raghu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 4:32 PM > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: CompositeRollingAppender absorption ? > > > Is the CompositeRollingAppender class contributed by Kevin Steppe > going to be 'absorbed' into the log4j distro ? > > I am curios as I feel it fulfills a common need, and does a > good job at it. > > thanks, > raghu > > ps: it's package name is org.apache.log4j. It's not updated > with v 1.2.5 > I have a need for it. What's the procedure ? > > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
