At 10:32 23.07.2002 -0700, Mark Womack wrote: >Actually, I must correct myself. The current plan does call for some kind >of rollover work, which Kevin is listed as owning. > >http://jakarta.apache.org/log4j/docs/plan.html > >I don't know how that intersects the CompositeRollingAppender code.
In log4j 1.3 an alternative to CompositeRollingAppender will be offered. Consequently, there are no plans to include CompositeRollingAppender in log4j at this stage. >-Mark -- Ceki For complete log4j documentation, please see http://qos.ch/log4jBook.html -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
