+1 > -----Original Message----- > From: Ceki Gulcu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, 16 October 2002 05:34 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [VOTE] Requiring JDK 1.2 > > > Hello all, > > Given the hoops we have to jump through in order to support JDK 1.1 > and given the limiteed the resources at our disposal, I propose to > drop support for JDK 1.1 and require JDK 1.2 as of log4j version > 1.3. This will result in cleaner code and some problems faced by our > users will automagically disappear. For example, the NDC.remove method > is required only because JDK 1.1 does not support ThreadLocal > variables. NDC.remove can be a pita: > > http://www.mail-archive.com/jboss-development%40lists.sourceforge.net/msg30906.html > > Anyway, here is my +1 for requiring JDK 1.2 as of log4j version 1.3. > > > -- > Ceki > > TCP implementations will follow a general principle of robustness: be > conservative in what you do, be liberal in what you accept from > others. -- Jon Postel, RFC 793 > > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >
-- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
