Starting with log4j 1.3 I think the timing would be appropriate to drop JDK 1.1 support.
+1 -----Original Message----- From: Ceki Gülcü [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 3:34 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [VOTE] Requiring JDK 1.2 Hello all, Given the hoops we have to jump through in order to support JDK 1.1 and given the limiteed the resources at our disposal, I propose to drop support for JDK 1.1 and require JDK 1.2 as of log4j version 1.3. This will result in cleaner code and some problems faced by our users will automagically disappear. For example, the NDC.remove method is required only because JDK 1.1 does not support ThreadLocal variables. NDC.remove can be a pita: http://www.mail-archive.com/jboss-development%40lists.sourceforge.net/msg309 06.html Anyway, here is my +1 for requiring JDK 1.2 as of log4j version 1.3. -- Ceki TCP implementations will follow a general principle of robustness: be conservative in what you do, be liberal in what you accept from others. -- Jon Postel, RFC 793 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
