JDK 1.1 support has always been a positive feature of log4j but i can understand the arguments for switching future releases to JDK1.2.

as a consideration to users who require JDK1.1 support, it would be nice to keep the 1.2 release series in cold storage. a link to the latest log4j 1.2 release on the web site would be good and it would also be nice to keep the log4j 1.2 alive (somewhere) in cvs so that (if necessary) bugs could be fixed.

- robert

On Tuesday, October 15, 2002, at 10:18 PM, Scott Sanders wrote:

I am also not a committer, but I am a prolific user. I am +1, as log4j < 1.3 is full of features and stable.

Thanks Ceki and crew,
Scott

-----Original Message-----
From: Macarty, Jay {PBSG} [mailto:Jay.Macarty@;pbsg.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 1:37 PM
To: 'Log4J Developers List'
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Requiring JDK 1.2


I agree as well.

+1


-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Moore [mailto:jim.moore@;veritas.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 3:30 PM
To: 'Log4J Developers List'
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Requiring JDK 1.2


Starting with log4j 1.3 I think the timing would be
appropriate to drop JDK
1.1 support.

+1


-----Original Message-----
From: Ceki Gülcü [mailto:ceki@;qos.ch]
Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 3:34 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [VOTE] Requiring JDK 1.2


Hello all,

Given the hoops we have to jump through in order to support
JDK 1.1 and
given the limiteed the resources at our disposal, I propose
to drop support
for JDK 1.1 and require JDK 1.2 as of log4j version 1.3. This
will result in
cleaner code and some problems faced by our users will automagically
disappear. For example, the NDC.remove method is required
only because JDK
1.1 does not support ThreadLocal variables. NDC.remove can be a pita:

http://www.mail-archive.com/jboss-
development%40lists.sourceforge.net/msg309
06.html

Anyway, here is my +1 for requiring JDK 1.2 as of log4j version 1.3.


--
Ceki

TCP implementations will follow a general principle of robustness: be
conservative in what you do, be liberal in what you accept from others. -
-
Jon Postel, RFC 793

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:log4j-dev-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:log4j-dev-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:log4j-dev-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:log4j-dev-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:log4j-dev-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:log4j-dev-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:log4j-dev-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:log4j-dev-help@;jakarta.apache.org>

Reply via email to