> > <log4j:event logger="org.xyz.SomeLogger" > > timestamp="213341234" level="INFO" thread="main"> > > <log4j:message><![CDATA[some message]]></log4j:message> > > <log4j:propertySet> > > <log4j:property name="key1" value="val1"/> > > <log4j:property name="key2" value="val2"/> > > </log4j:propertySet> > > <log4j:mdc> > > <log4j:dc name="key1" value="val1"/> > > <log4j:dc name="key2" value="val2"/> > > ... > > </log4j:mdc> > > </log4j:event> > > I don't see why the > <log4j:property name="key1" value="val1"/> > and > <log4j:dc name="key1" value="val1"/> > Need to be different. > > Essentially you just have a 'generic' map. They have > different names, one is > propertySet (not really a set by the way, definitely a map) > and mdc (also a > map). Why can't they have the same xml data items: > > <log4j:data name="key1" value="val1"/>
I agree with Nicko. It would be better to have a single element type for the key/value data that can be used for both properties and mdc.
As mentioned previously, I do not feel strongly either way.
-Mark
--
Ceki
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
