Ok, thanks everyone for their input. I'm learning things about XML on the
way, so thanks.
After reading the thread over a couple of times, could I summarise the
feeling of the group, that the format:
<log4j:mdc>
<log4j:data name="key1" value="val1"/>
<log4j:data name="key2" value="val2"/>
...
</log4j:mdc>
would be acceptable to the group? (along with valid Transform.escapeTag
stuff)
The <log4j:data> element could/should/would also be a valid sub-node of the
<log4j:propertySet> node. This seems like a good idea. Since I am
unfamiliar with the propertySet stuff, could I suggest that that
modification is a treated as a separate task after the MDC has been
integrated? I'd rather not bite off too much right now, and come back to it
after MDC is working nicely.
Scott Deboy has kindly mailed me a DTD that he was using for his Chainsaw
work & MDC, so it looks like I can easily modify that to suite the above
format.
Could everyone/anyone with voting privs +1/+0/-0/-1 the above format so I
can proceed? Or is there more to discuss?
Thanks.
Paul Smith
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
