DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24803>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24803

LevelMatchFilter not working as expected





------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-11-19 17:18 -------
Claudio,

That's what I also gathered (see my post at 16:40) after reading over Ceki's 
book and studying further the filter's code.  It's a matter of really 
understanding how filtering works.  I'm ok with the names now.  I would just 
look at the LevelRangeFilter to make sure it's following this filtering 
structure, which I don't think it is now.


As for what you were saying about continuing down the chain even on deny.  
>From what I see, the chain processing works in an OR fashion.  First match 
returns, whether it be DENY or ACCEPT, and is logged if is NEUTRAL and there's 
no DenyAllFilter at the end.

This raised a question/concern that I posted in the user mailing list.  What 
if you want to use the filters in an AND condition fashion?  Example, only log 
events if they are of level INFO and the message text contains "test".  I 
can't figure out how you could do this currently?

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to