DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24803>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24803

LevelMatchFilter not working as expected





------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-11-19 18:55 -------
Thanks Claudio, that's what I thought I'd end up having to do.  

Before I continue with my findings on an AND type filter, I wanted to know if 
you were able to verify if LevelRangeFilter (not LevelMatchFilter) does work 
the way we have determined the filters to be working?


I got a reply to my post on the user list about this issue and got a reply 
back from Scott Deboy.  He mentionned having contributed an ExpressionFilter 
that should be in the next distribution, which should handle such case.


Here's what he wrote:

I'm not sure about whether this capability is available using the latest 
distribution's set of filters, but I've contributed a simple expression 
language and an ExpressionFilter (should be a part of the next release) which 
provide support for expressions using a number of operators, grouping 
(parens), AND, OR and NOT operators, etc..  You will be able to define an 
expression like:

"( LEVEL == INFO ) && ( MSG == TEST )"

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to