At 05:53 PM 12/16/2004, Scott Deboy wrote:
A few more thoughts:
You can't tell by the jar name that it doesn't include the ORO dependencies.
and likely to cause avoidable confusion down the road.
For this reason, if it was a concern I'd be +0 on reverting the ant script changes, but I'd like to leave the changes to RuleFactory.
Having given this a little more thought. With or without the changes, the build can be considered broken. I think it makes sense to explicitly add a ORO dependency when building log4j.jar, in the same way it has a dependency on mail.jar or jms.jar.
Scott, would you do the honors?
-- Ceki Gülcü
The complete log4j manual: http://qos.ch/log4j/
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
