On Thursday 24 March 2005 07:00, Ceki G�lc� wrote: > Thanks Mark. Just finished reading it. As you said, it does not go into > terrible but otherwise a pretty decent article.
Didn't we discuss before the possibility to make JUL the application API, and Log4J the backend logging provider? Would that kill off a lot of the commons-loggings and similar issues, or is it just transferred elsewhere? Cheers Niclas --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
