On 10/02/2010 6:12 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
Hi all,
I would like to bring up the old discussion on future Log4J
development again. I think christmas killed it before there was an
satisfying conclusion. I was basically asking if Log4J is dead or not;
several opinions rose. There is logback as a stable project,
implementing the meanwhile wellknown SLF4J API.
Curt showed me a bunch of mails/tickets in Jira for a possible
redesign of Log4J known as 2.0
On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 7:33 PM, Curt Arnold<[email protected]> wrote:
The JIRA tracker for log4j2 has captured some potential design goals at
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2.
Here are some posts to start as a reading list for the backstory (reverse
chronological order):
http://marc.info/?l=log4j-user&m=125725041724346&w=2
http://marc.info/?t=122830451800001&r=1&w=2
http://marc.info/?t=121385743100001&r=1&w=2
http://marc.info/?t=121094847000005&r=1&w=2
That should be enough to get started as they should contain links to older
articles.
Some people thought it might be a good idea to continue because of
f.e. the Apache community model. Other said that might be a waste of
time.
Log4J in my opinion is near to the attic, if there is no development
activity. I would think this would be pretty said and I am willing to
spend some time. But I cannot lead the development - there are others
who were involved in tons of discussions in the past.
Question: are some more interested developers subscribed to this list
who are willing to work on Log4J 2.0 again?
Hello Christian,
Another option would be to declare logback as the official successor
to log4j, i.e. designate it as log4j 2.0.
Cheers,
Christian
--
Ceki
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
