On 10/02/2010 7:45 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
Another option would be to declare logback as the official successor
to log4j, i.e. designate it as log4j 2.0.
yes - that would be the most perfect solution i think. But are you
willing to do bring the code back to apache?
Sorry, I wasn't very clear. I had meant that the log4j declare logback as
its successor with logback remaining where it is. Bringing logback to Apache was
not on my mind.
Cheers,
--
Ceki
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
