> Doh! - I shall rewrite history like it never happened ;)
> They are not required, but I think it's the best place for them. Where else 
> do you propose?

I am not sure because i am not too deep in the log4j code, but if they
would stay in the "core" - would that hurt?


>
> On 8/04/2010, at 8:53 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>
>> Well, I somehow like this.
>> I am not sure about  Apache Log4j-Contribtutions (note the spelling
>> error) and Performance Code - are these two really necessary?
>>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org

Reply via email to