Well, I somehow like this.
I am not sure about  Apache Log4j-Contribtutions (note the spelling
error) and Performance Code - are these two really necessary?

Christian

On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 9:09 AM, Antony Stubbs <antony.stu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> More Mavenity goodness:
> http://github.com/astubbs/log4j/tree/modulriseify
> We now have
> [INFO]
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> [INFO] Reactor Summary:
> [INFO]
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> [INFO] Apache Log4j-Parent POM ............................... SUCCESS
> [5.369s]
> [INFO] Apache Log4j-Core ..................................... SUCCESS
> [21.342s]
> [INFO] Apache Log4j-Modules POM .............................. SUCCESS
> [0.029s]
> [INFO] Apache Log4j-Chainsaw V1 .............................. SUCCESS
> [4.084s]
> [INFO] Apache Log4j-Net ...................................... SUCCESS
> [4.933s]
> [INFO] Apache Log4j-Contribtutions ........................... SUCCESS
> [7.657s]
> [INFO] Apache Log4j-LF5 ...................................... SUCCESS
> [9.700s]
> [INFO] Apache Log4j-Performance Code ......................... SUCCESS
> [5.164s]
> [INFO]
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> [INFO]
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> [INFO] BUILD SUCCESSFUL
> [INFO]
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> [INFO] Total time: 59 seconds
> [INFO] Finished at: Thu Apr 08 18:57:28 NZST 2010
> [INFO] Final Memory: 45M/252M
> [INFO]
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> With the test results (fixed the majority of them, only a couple left) for
> log4j-core:
> Results :
>
> Failed tests:
>   propertiesTest(org.apache.log4j.defaultInit.TestCase3)
>   combinedTest(org.apache.log4j.defaultInit.TestCase4)
>   xmlTest(org.apache.log4j.defaultInit.TestCase2)
>
> Tests in error:
>   test2(org.apache.log4j.varia.ErrorHandlerTestCase)
>   toLevelTest2(org.apache.log4j.helpers.OptionConverterTestCase)
>   toLevelTest3(org.apache.log4j.helpers.OptionConverterTestCase)
>   toLevelTest4(org.apache.log4j.helpers.OptionConverterTestCase)
>   toLevelTest5(org.apache.log4j.helpers.OptionConverterTestCase)
>
> Tests run: 649, Failures: 3, Errors: 2, Skipped: 0
> With the test results (fixed the majority of them, only a couple left) for
> log4j-net:
> Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.195 sec
> Results :
> Tests in error:
> Tests run: 32, Failures: 0, Errors: 3, Skipped: 0
> NT is disabled though - that ones a little more tricky to migrate.
> Give it a go and let me know your thoughts:
> git clone git://github.com/astubbs/log4j.git
> git checkout origin/modulriseify
> Cheers!
>
> <antony.stu...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
> Hi guys, following on from my comment, I've uploaded a proposed
>
> modularisation here:
>
> http://github.com/astubbs/log4j/commit/7c5b4689d5cc509d207e3270fc6f012ea8064c6d
>
> http://github.com/astubbs/log4j/commit/ce3ce992d509e8c341914437bbc11442711fc5bf
>
> As well as the module split, I would also do a more complete maven
>
> migration
>
> (except for possibly the NT build stuff).
>
> My immediate drive for this (apart from the other obvious benefits) is
>
> the
>
> file size of the log4j jar (~800k). Removing LF5 alone removes 490k
>
> (uncompressed).
>
> I know this drives up the complexity, but I think it is worth if to get
>
> the
>
> at least the GUI stuff out.
>
> Cheers.
>
>
> Antony Stubbs wrote:
>
> Hi guys, what's the established opinion from log4j about breaking
>
> log4j up into modules ie net, nt appender, chainsaw etc?
>
> Regards,
>
> Antony Stubbs
>
> Technical Architect - Prototyping
>
> Telecom Retail
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org
>
> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org
>
>
>
> -----
>
> ___________________________
>
> http://stubbisms.wordpress.com
>
>
>
> -----
>
> ___________________________
>
> http://stubbisms.wordpress.com http://stubbisms.wordpress.com
>
> --
>
> View this message in context:
>
> http://old.nabble.com/Modular-Build-tp28170343p28172026.html
>
> Sent from the Log4j - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org
>
> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -----
> ___________________________
>
> http://stubbisms.wordpress.com http://stubbisms.wordpress.com
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://old.nabble.com/Modular-Build-tp28170343p28172150.html
> Sent from the Log4j - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org
>
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org

Reply via email to