Doh! - I shall rewrite history like it never happened ;)

They are not required, but I think it's the best place for them. Where else do 
you propose?

On 8/04/2010, at 8:53 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:

> Well, I somehow like this.
> I am not sure about  Apache Log4j-Contribtutions (note the spelling
> error) and Performance Code - are these two really necessary?
> 
> Christian
> 
> On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 9:09 AM, Antony Stubbs <antony.stu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> More Mavenity goodness:
>> http://github.com/astubbs/log4j/tree/modulriseify
>> We now have
>> [INFO]
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> [INFO] Reactor Summary:
>> [INFO]
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> [INFO] Apache Log4j-Parent POM ............................... SUCCESS
>> [5.369s]
>> [INFO] Apache Log4j-Core ..................................... SUCCESS
>> [21.342s]
>> [INFO] Apache Log4j-Modules POM .............................. SUCCESS
>> [0.029s]
>> [INFO] Apache Log4j-Chainsaw V1 .............................. SUCCESS
>> [4.084s]
>> [INFO] Apache Log4j-Net ...................................... SUCCESS
>> [4.933s]
>> [INFO] Apache Log4j-Contribtutions ........................... SUCCESS
>> [7.657s]
>> [INFO] Apache Log4j-LF5 ...................................... SUCCESS
>> [9.700s]
>> [INFO] Apache Log4j-Performance Code ......................... SUCCESS
>> [5.164s]
>> [INFO]
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> [INFO]
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> [INFO] BUILD SUCCESSFUL
>> [INFO]
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> [INFO] Total time: 59 seconds
>> [INFO] Finished at: Thu Apr 08 18:57:28 NZST 2010
>> [INFO] Final Memory: 45M/252M
>> [INFO]
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> With the test results (fixed the majority of them, only a couple left) for
>> log4j-core:
>> Results :
>> 
>> Failed tests:
>>   propertiesTest(org.apache.log4j.defaultInit.TestCase3)
>>   combinedTest(org.apache.log4j.defaultInit.TestCase4)
>>   xmlTest(org.apache.log4j.defaultInit.TestCase2)
>> 
>> Tests in error:
>>   test2(org.apache.log4j.varia.ErrorHandlerTestCase)
>>   toLevelTest2(org.apache.log4j.helpers.OptionConverterTestCase)
>>   toLevelTest3(org.apache.log4j.helpers.OptionConverterTestCase)
>>   toLevelTest4(org.apache.log4j.helpers.OptionConverterTestCase)
>>   toLevelTest5(org.apache.log4j.helpers.OptionConverterTestCase)
>> 
>> Tests run: 649, Failures: 3, Errors: 2, Skipped: 0
>> With the test results (fixed the majority of them, only a couple left) for
>> log4j-net:
>> Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.195 sec
>> Results :
>> Tests in error:
>> Tests run: 32, Failures: 0, Errors: 3, Skipped: 0
>> NT is disabled though - that ones a little more tricky to migrate.
>> Give it a go and let me know your thoughts:
>> git clone git://github.com/astubbs/log4j.git
>> git checkout origin/modulriseify
>> Cheers!
>> 
>> <antony.stu...@gmail.com>wrote:
>> 
>> Hi guys, following on from my comment, I've uploaded a proposed
>> 
>> modularisation here:
>> 
>> http://github.com/astubbs/log4j/commit/7c5b4689d5cc509d207e3270fc6f012ea8064c6d
>> 
>> http://github.com/astubbs/log4j/commit/ce3ce992d509e8c341914437bbc11442711fc5bf
>> 
>> As well as the module split, I would also do a more complete maven
>> 
>> migration
>> 
>> (except for possibly the NT build stuff).
>> 
>> My immediate drive for this (apart from the other obvious benefits) is
>> 
>> the
>> 
>> file size of the log4j jar (~800k). Removing LF5 alone removes 490k
>> 
>> (uncompressed).
>> 
>> I know this drives up the complexity, but I think it is worth if to get
>> 
>> the
>> 
>> at least the GUI stuff out.
>> 
>> Cheers.
>> 
>> 
>> Antony Stubbs wrote:
>> 
>> Hi guys, what's the established opinion from log4j about breaking
>> 
>> log4j up into modules ie net, nt appender, chainsaw etc?
>> 
>> Regards,
>> 
>> Antony Stubbs
>> 
>> Technical Architect - Prototyping
>> 
>> Telecom Retail
>> 
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> 
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org
>> 
>> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -----
>> 
>> ___________________________
>> 
>> http://stubbisms.wordpress.com
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -----
>> 
>> ___________________________
>> 
>> http://stubbisms.wordpress.com http://stubbisms.wordpress.com
>> 
>> --
>> 
>> View this message in context:
>> 
>> http://old.nabble.com/Modular-Build-tp28170343p28172026.html
>> 
>> Sent from the Log4j - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>> 
>> 
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> 
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org
>> 
>> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -----
>> ___________________________
>> 
>> http://stubbisms.wordpress.com http://stubbisms.wordpress.com
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://old.nabble.com/Modular-Build-tp28170343p28172150.html
>> Sent from the Log4j - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>> 
>> 
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org
>> 
>> 
>> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org

Reply via email to