On Jun 1, 2012, at 12:26 AM, Antonio Petrelli wrote: > 2012/6/1 Ralph Goers <rgo...@apache.org>: >> Why would that require a 1.3? > > Just because it will be a complete change in organizations of jars. If > you want to stick with 1.2.x version scheme it's only a matter of > changing a version. > > Notice that I am not here to interfere with Log4j team decisions, only > to help with the build.
Feel free to "interfere". All opinions, suggestions, feedback, etc are welcome! Ralph --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org
