On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 2:49 PM, Antonio Petrelli <antonio.petre...@gmail.com> wrote: > 2012/6/1 Christian Grobmeier <grobme...@gmail.com>: >> Suggestion: the easy part is to make chainsaw and lf5 classes a >> module. I have nuked them but Jacob requested they come back :-) These >> are all GUI related stuff. Next thing I'll do is create the module >> folders and get the code back to these. >> Then we can move the rest into a "core" folder and create the parent pom. >> >> Do you think this would be an acceptable move? > > So if I understand you well, you would like to create a core, simply > by removing the GUI-related stuff? > I think that, if a reorganization has to be done, it should be done > the right way.
I think like that: /pom.xml <-- parent /core/src/main/java <-- Just logging classes /lf5/src/main/java /chainsaw/src/main/java etc The core might need some more extractions but this could be the first step. >> https://github.com/astubbs/log4j/tree/modulriseify > > With the exception of directory naming, it seems like a good job. Why > did'nt you take it in consideration 2 years ago? I was not really deep into log4j back then (still fighting) and why this has not been included: don't know. But better late than never. Cheers Christian > > Antonio > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org > -- http://www.grobmeier.de https://www.timeandbill.de --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org
