Currently we have three different names for things that provide a bridge/adapter from other logging APIs to the Log4j2 implementation: (Commons Logging) Bridge, (Log4j 1.2) API, and (SLF4J) Binding.
Would it be a good idea to call them all "Bridge"? On the web site, components would then become: Commons Logging Bridge, Log4j 1.2 Bridge, and SLF4J Bridge. The jar files would become: log4j-jcl-bridge-2.0.jar log4j-1.2-api-bridge-2.0.jar log4j-slf4j-bridge-2.0.jar I would especially like to rename log4j-1.2-api-2.0.jar so we only have one jar with "api" in the name. Thoughts?
