I also find the inconsistency in naming confusing. I always have to read the description to remind myself what direction a module follows.
Gary On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 10:11 PM, Nick Williams < [email protected]> wrote: > Agreed, on all counts. > > Nick > > > On Jul 17, 2013, at 9:07 PM, Remko Popma wrote: > > Currently we have three different names for things that provide a > bridge/adapter from other logging APIs to the Log4j2 implementation: > (Commons Logging) Bridge, (Log4j 1.2) API, and (SLF4J) Binding. > > Would it be a good idea to call them all "Bridge"? > > On the web site, components would then become: > Commons Logging Bridge, Log4j 1.2 Bridge, and SLF4J Bridge. > > The jar files would become: > log4j-jcl-bridge-2.0.jar > log4j-1.2-api-bridge-2.0.jar > log4j-slf4j-bridge-2.0.jar > > I would especially like to rename log4j-1.2-api-2.0.jar so we only have > one jar with "api" in the name. > > Thoughts? > > > -- E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected] Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition<http://www.manning.com/bauer3/> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com Home: http://garygregory.com/ Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
