Agreed, on all counts. Nick
On Jul 17, 2013, at 9:07 PM, Remko Popma wrote: > Currently we have three different names for things that provide a > bridge/adapter from other logging APIs to the Log4j2 implementation: > (Commons Logging) Bridge, (Log4j 1.2) API, and (SLF4J) Binding. > > Would it be a good idea to call them all "Bridge"? > > On the web site, components would then become: > Commons Logging Bridge, Log4j 1.2 Bridge, and SLF4J Bridge. > > The jar files would become: > log4j-jcl-bridge-2.0.jar > log4j-1.2-api-bridge-2.0.jar > log4j-slf4j-bridge-2.0.jar > > I would especially like to rename log4j-1.2-api-2.0.jar so we only have one > jar with "api" in the name. > > Thoughts?
