Nick, I do not think you can go wrong by writing 2.0 in the book. I'm OK with 2.0 and 2.0.0 even though 2.0.0 feels redundant. Like someone else posted I find the .FINAL and -RELEASE and whatnot ludicrous.
Gary On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 2:14 AM, Nick Williams <nicho...@nicholaswilliams.net > wrote: > Well well well. I'm sensing a lot of disagreement. Too bad my book goes to > the printers Wednesday. I have a feeling no matter what I put in it there's > a good chance it'll change. :-P > > Any way we can come to a consensus in the next 6-8 hours or so (by 9 a.m. > CST)? > > N > > On Feb 3, 2014, at 3:46 PM, Matt Sicker wrote: > > Plus, if we're really keen on OSGi support, note that OSGi assumes version > numbers follow the semantic versioning scheme. Producers use an API like > [1.1, 1.2), whereas consumers use an API like [1.1, 2.0). Yes, those are > half-open intervals, and yes, that is the official notation. :) > > > On 3 February 2014 15:41, Christian Grobmeier <grobme...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 3 Feb 2014, at 22:14, Matt Sicker wrote: >> >> > I like 2.0.0 because semver.org etc., although as long as it's not a >> dumb >> > version number like GA or RELEASE or Final, I'm happy with it. >> >> Sticking with semver might be a good idea. Its a language many understand >> and we should try to stick with that lanugage as well. >> >> > >> > >> > On 3 February 2014 07:07, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> >> Keep it simple: 2.0. >> >> >> >> Gary >> >> >> >> >> >> -------- Original message -------- >> >> From: Christian Grobmeier >> >> Date:02/03/2014 05:12 (GMT-05:00) >> >> To: Log4J Developers List >> >> Subject: Re: What will the GA version number be? >> >> >> >> Also 2.0 or 2.0.0 for me >> >> >> >> On 3 Feb 2014, at 7:41, Ralph Goers wrote: >> >> >> >>> I had thought it would be 2.0. >> >>> >> >>> Sent from my iPad >> >>> >> >>>> On Feb 2, 2014, at 8:59 PM, Nick Williams >> >>>> <nicho...@nicholaswilliams.net> wrote: >> >>>> >> >>>> I'm finalizing the logging chapter of my book to send to the printers >> >>>> Wednesday (I'm so glad I got to correct it to say Level was >> >>>> extendable!), and I need to know what the Maven artifact GA version >> >>>> number will be. I print the new Maven artifacts used in each chapter >> >>>> on the first page of the chapter as a guide to the user. Log4j is the >> >>>> only library I'm using that isn't yet GA. I want to be sure the >> >>>> version numbers I'm printing are correct. >> >>>> >> >>>> Here are the options that I can think of for the GA release: >> >>>> >> >>>> 2.0 >> >>>> 2.0-GA >> >>>> 2.0.GA >> >>>> 2.0.Final >> >>>> 2.0.RELEASE >> >>>> 2.0.0 >> >>>> 2.0.0-GA >> >>>> 2.0.0.GA >> >>>> 2.0.0.Final >> >>>> 2.0.0.RELEASE >> >>>> >> >>>> So, which is it going to be? I assume that eventually we're going to >> >>>> have a 2.0.1, 2.0.2, etc., so it would seem to me that, whatever GA >> >>>> is, it should start with 2.0.0. Doesn't seem to make a lot of sense >> >>>> to go from 2.0 to 2.0.1. However, all of our beta releases have been >> >>>> 2.0-Betan. >> >>>> >> >>>> Thoughts? >> >>>> >> >>>> Nick >> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org >> >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org >> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org >> >> >> >> >> >> --- >> >> http://www.grobmeier.de >> >> The Zen Programmer: http://bit.ly/12lC6DL >> >> @grobmeier >> >> GPG: 0xA5CC90DB >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org >> >> >> >> >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> >> >> >> --- >> http://www.grobmeier.de >> The Zen Programmer: http://bit.ly/12lC6DL >> @grobmeier >> GPG: 0xA5CC90DB >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org >> >> > > > -- > Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> > > > -- E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition<http://www.manning.com/bauer3/> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com Home: http://garygregory.com/ Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
