I'm happy to let Ralph pick, either way is fine with me. Gary
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 2:27 AM, Nick Williams <nicho...@nicholaswilliams.net > wrote: > Matt and Christian did, however, point out semver. There's something to be > said about following a community practice, and use of x.y.z far outweighs > use of x.y in OSS. > > N > > On Feb 4, 2014, at 1:21 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > Nick, > > I do not think you can go wrong by writing 2.0 in the book. I'm OK with > 2.0 and 2.0.0 even though 2.0.0 feels redundant. Like someone else posted I > find the .FINAL and -RELEASE and whatnot ludicrous. > > Gary > > > On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 2:14 AM, Nick Williams < > nicho...@nicholaswilliams.net> wrote: > >> Well well well. I'm sensing a lot of disagreement. Too bad my book goes >> to the printers Wednesday. I have a feeling no matter what I put in it >> there's a good chance it'll change. :-P >> >> Any way we can come to a consensus in the next 6-8 hours or so (by 9 a.m. >> CST)? >> >> N >> >> On Feb 3, 2014, at 3:46 PM, Matt Sicker wrote: >> >> Plus, if we're really keen on OSGi support, note that OSGi assumes >> version numbers follow the semantic versioning scheme. Producers use an API >> like [1.1, 1.2), whereas consumers use an API like [1.1, 2.0). Yes, those >> are half-open intervals, and yes, that is the official notation. :) >> >> >> On 3 February 2014 15:41, Christian Grobmeier <grobme...@gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> On 3 Feb 2014, at 22:14, Matt Sicker wrote: >>> >>> > I like 2.0.0 because semver.org etc., although as long as it's not a >>> dumb >>> > version number like GA or RELEASE or Final, I'm happy with it. >>> >>> Sticking with semver might be a good idea. Its a language many understand >>> and we should try to stick with that lanugage as well. >>> >>> > >>> > >>> > On 3 February 2014 07:07, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> > >>> >> Keep it simple: 2.0. >>> >> >>> >> Gary >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> -------- Original message -------- >>> >> From: Christian Grobmeier >>> >> Date:02/03/2014 05:12 (GMT-05:00) >>> >> To: Log4J Developers List >>> >> Subject: Re: What will the GA version number be? >>> >> >>> >> Also 2.0 or 2.0.0 for me >>> >> >>> >> On 3 Feb 2014, at 7:41, Ralph Goers wrote: >>> >> >>> >>> I had thought it would be 2.0. >>> >>> >>> >>> Sent from my iPad >>> >>> >>> >>>> On Feb 2, 2014, at 8:59 PM, Nick Williams >>> >>>> <nicho...@nicholaswilliams.net> wrote: >>> >>>> >>> >>>> I'm finalizing the logging chapter of my book to send to the >>> printers >>> >>>> Wednesday (I'm so glad I got to correct it to say Level was >>> >>>> extendable!), and I need to know what the Maven artifact GA version >>> >>>> number will be. I print the new Maven artifacts used in each chapter >>> >>>> on the first page of the chapter as a guide to the user. Log4j is >>> the >>> >>>> only library I'm using that isn't yet GA. I want to be sure the >>> >>>> version numbers I'm printing are correct. >>> >>>> >>> >>>> Here are the options that I can think of for the GA release: >>> >>>> >>> >>>> 2.0 >>> >>>> 2.0-GA >>> >>>> 2.0.GA >>> >>>> 2.0.Final >>> >>>> 2.0.RELEASE >>> >>>> 2.0.0 >>> >>>> 2.0.0-GA >>> >>>> 2.0.0.GA >>> >>>> 2.0.0.Final >>> >>>> 2.0.0.RELEASE >>> >>>> >>> >>>> So, which is it going to be? I assume that eventually we're going to >>> >>>> have a 2.0.1, 2.0.2, etc., so it would seem to me that, whatever GA >>> >>>> is, it should start with 2.0.0. Doesn't seem to make a lot of sense >>> >>>> to go from 2.0 to 2.0.1. However, all of our beta releases have been >>> >>>> 2.0-Betan. >>> >>>> >>> >>>> Thoughts? >>> >>>> >>> >>>> Nick >>> >>>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org >>> >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org >>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org >>> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> --- >>> >> http://www.grobmeier.de >>> >> The Zen Programmer: http://bit.ly/12lC6DL >>> >> @grobmeier >>> >> GPG: 0xA5CC90DB >>> >> >>> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org >>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org >>> >> >>> >> >>> > >>> > >>> > -- >>> > Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> >>> >>> >>> --- >>> http://www.grobmeier.de >>> The Zen Programmer: http://bit.ly/12lC6DL >>> @grobmeier >>> GPG: 0xA5CC90DB >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> >> >> >> > > > -- > E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org > Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second > Edition<http://www.manning.com/bauer3/> > JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/> > Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/> > Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com > Home: http://garygregory.com/ > Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory > > > -- E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition<http://www.manning.com/bauer3/> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com Home: http://garygregory.com/ Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
