I agree with Nick. Didn't we discuss this before, for the beta-9 release (and came to the same conclusion)?
On Tuesday, February 11, 2014, Nick Williams <nicho...@nicholaswilliams.net> wrote: > I'm not sure what our policy is, either, but there's nothing we can do > about it. We can't modify the license header of those files--that would be > in violation of the license under which JQuery is made available. And > ceasing to use JQuery would make the site not very good anymore. > > Either way, since this is JS for the site and not source code for Log4j, > and since those files have been there for a very long time, I certainly > don't think it should hold up this release. > > Nick > > On Feb 10, 2014, at 4:12 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > RAT complains: > > ******************************* > > Unapproved licenses: > > src/site/resources/js/jquery.js > src/site/resources/js/jquery.min.js > > ******************************* > > I'm not sure what our policy is for this kind of issue. > > Gary > > > > On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 2:56 PM, Nick Williams < > nicho...@nicholaswilliams.net> wrote: > >> >> On Feb 9, 2014, at 1:56 PM, Nick Williams wrote: >> >> *This is a vote to release Log4j 2.0-rc1, the twelfth release of Log4j >> 2.0.* >> >> <snip /> >> >> *Please test and cast your votes.* >> [x] +1, release the artifacts >> >> [ ] -1, don't release because... >> >> >> Nick >> > > > > -- > E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org > Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second > Edition<http://www.manning.com/bauer3/> > JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/> > Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/> > Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com > Home: http://garygregory.com/ > Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory > > >
