Gentle reminder: we need one more PMC vote to be able to release. On Tuesday, February 11, 2014, Christian Grobmeier <grobme...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think Rat is wrong on the jquery license. > > They have included a header, but its not identified by rat. > MIT is a clear "yes" for me. We have several other portions of MIT code > inside AL code (i.e. commons compress if i recall correctly). > > If we want to put it into the NOTICE file we need to make sure to add > bootstrap.min.js > and prettify.min.js as well (both AL 2.0) > > I would not use a CDN because people might download it for a reason - > maybe they > have no real connection where they want to work with it. > > > > On 11 Feb 2014, at 3:20, Gary Gregory wrote: > > This should be documented clearly in our build (in this case, in the POM). >> >> Is the JQuery license compatible with ours? >> >> If you read https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-a as a >> "yes" then the files RAT complains about can be excluded from the report. >> If you read it as a "no", then we cannot include JQuery. >> >> It reads like a "yes" to me. >> >> The next question is: Do we need to add JQuery to our NOTICE file? >> >> Gary >> >> >> >> >> >> On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 8:46 PM, Remko Popma <remko.po...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> I agree with Nick. >>> Didn't we discuss this before, for the beta-9 release (and came to the >>> same conclusion)? >>> >>> >>> On Tuesday, February 11, 2014, Nick Williams < >>> nicho...@nicholaswilliams.net> wrote: >>> >>> I'm not sure what our policy is, either, but there's nothing we can do >>>> about it. We can't modify the license header of those files--that would >>>> be >>>> in violation of the license under which JQuery is made available. And >>>> ceasing to use JQuery would make the site not very good anymore. >>>> >>>> Either way, since this is JS for the site and not source code for Log4j, >>>> and since those files have been there for a very long time, I certainly >>>> don't think it should hold up this release. >>>> >>>> Nick >>>> >>>> On Feb 10, 2014, at 4:12 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: >>>> >>>> RAT complains: >>>> >>>> ******************************* >>>> >>>> Unapproved licenses: >>>> >>>> src/site/resources/js/jquery.js >>>> src/site/resources/js/jquery.min.js >>>> >>>> ******************************* >>>> >>>> I'm not sure what our policy is for this kind of issue. >>>> >>>> Gary >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 2:56 PM, Nick Williams < >>>> nicho...@nicholaswilliams.net> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> On Feb 9, 2014, at 1:56 PM, Nick Williams wrote: >>>>> >>>>> *This is a vote to release Log4j 2.0-rc1, the twelfth release of Log4j >>>>> 2.0.* >>>>> >>>>> <snip /> >>>>> >>>>> *Please test and cast your votes.* >>>>> [x] +1, release the artifacts >>>>> >>>>> [ ] -1, don't release because... >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Nick >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org > >
