Not sure if the site dependency needs to be considered part of our
software.
I recall having that discussion once i am going to dig archives
On 11 Feb 2014, at 6:13, Nicholas Williams wrote:
I think it's very clearly a yes. The legal page says code with the MIT
license can be included in ASF projects.
However, I have a suggestion for the next release that will make this
whole discussion moot: let's use the CDN instead of including the
JQuery source code in source control. That way we're not hosting the
JQuery files, and we don't have to worry about RAT reports, NOTICE
files, or license info in the POM.
As for RC1, I don't see any reason it can't proceed. This isn't a
regression—the JQuery files have been in source control for 14
months without incident or complaint.
Nick
Sent from my iPhone, so please forgive brief replies and frequent
typos
On Feb 10, 2014, at 20:20, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com>
wrote:
This should be documented clearly in our build (in this case, in the
POM).
Is the JQuery license compatible with ours?
If you read https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-a as
a "yes" then the files RAT complains about can be excluded from the
report. If you read it as a "no", then we cannot include JQuery.
It reads like a "yes" to me.
The next question is: Do we need to add JQuery to our NOTICE file?
Gary
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 8:46 PM, Remko Popma <remko.po...@gmail.com>
wrote:
I agree with Nick.
Didn't we discuss this before, for the beta-9 release (and came to
the same conclusion)?
On Tuesday, February 11, 2014, Nick Williams
<nicho...@nicholaswilliams.net> wrote:
I'm not sure what our policy is, either, but there's nothing we can
do about it. We can't modify the license header of those
files—that would be in violation of the license under which
JQuery is made available. And ceasing to use JQuery would make the
site not very good anymore.
Either way, since this is JS for the site and not source code for
Log4j, and since those files have been there for a very long time,
I certainly don't think it should hold up this release.
Nick
On Feb 10, 2014, at 4:12 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
RAT complains:
*******************************
Unapproved licenses:
src/site/resources/js/jquery.js
src/site/resources/js/jquery.min.js
*******************************
I'm not sure what our policy is for this kind of issue.
Gary
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 2:56 PM, Nick Williams
<nicho...@nicholaswilliams.net> wrote:
On Feb 9, 2014, at 1:56 PM, Nick Williams wrote:
This is a vote to release Log4j 2.0-rc1, the twelfth release of
Log4j 2.0.
<snip />
Please test and cast your votes.
[x] +1, release the artifacts
[ ] -1, don't release because...
Nick
--
E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org
Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition
JUnit in Action, Second Edition
Spring Batch in Action
Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
Home: http://garygregory.com/
Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
--
E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org
Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition
JUnit in Action, Second Edition
Spring Batch in Action
Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
Home: http://garygregory.com/
Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
---
http://www.grobmeier.de
The Zen Programmer: http://bit.ly/12lC6DL
@grobmeier
GPG: 0xA5CC90DB
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org
