The web site is still 2.0. On Tuesday, August 5, 2014, Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote:
> Looks like Maven Central has it: > > > http://search.maven.org/#search|ga|1|g%3A%22org.apache.logging.log4j%22%20AND%20v%3A%222.0.1%22 > <http://search.maven.org/#search%7Cga%7C1%7Cg%3A%22org.apache.logging.log4j%22%20AND%20v%3A%222.0.1%22> > > > On 4 August 2014 19:54, Remko Popma <[email protected] > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote: > >> Well, lesson learned. No big problem IMO. (Resending as I forgot to >> reply-all.) >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On 2014/08/05, at 9:04, Matt Sicker <[email protected] >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote: >> >> Well, good point. The sample jars come with the source code and javadoc >> jars. Well, I can't modify the deployment anymore as it's already moved >> from staging. :/ >> >> >> On 4 August 2014 18:35, Ralph Goers <[email protected] >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote: >> >>> Why would anyone want the sample jars? They would want the sample source >>> to modify them for their own purposes. All the source, including the >>> samples, is in the source distribution. >>> >>> Ralph >>> >>> On Aug 4, 2014, at 4:21 PM, Matt Sicker <[email protected] >>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote: >>> >>> I didn't delete the samples. I thought projects normally published >>> those, too? I know that several other Apache projects do so at least. >>> >>> On Monday, 4 August 2014, Ralph Goers <[email protected] >>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote: >>> >>>> As I said, you should delete anything that would never be referenced in >>>> a Maven project. This would include the distribution, samples and perf >>>> sub-projects. >>>> >>>> Ralph >>>> >>>> On Aug 4, 2014, at 11:59 AM, Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> I can do the Nexus part now. I deleted the distribution directory. >>>> Should I also delete log4j-perf due to it being GPL'd? >>>> >>>> >>>> On 4 August 2014 13:47, Ralph Goers <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> The order of publishing the artifacts doesn’t really matter much - >>>>> except you don’t really want the site going live until the artifacts are >>>>> committed to svn. I always do the Nexus release first. I believe you >>>>> have >>>>> permission to do that. If not I am pretty sure I can do it even though you >>>>> created it. >>>>> >>>>> Ralph >>>>> >>>>> On Aug 4, 2014, at 11:43 AM, Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> The steps said not to do that until after it was committed to the >>>>> other svn repo. I don't have rights to do any of that. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 4 August 2014 10:42, Ralph Goers <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Also, do you have rights to publish the site? I can publish the >>>>>> distribution artifacts when I get home tonight. I already have them when >>>>>> I >>>>>> verified the release. >>>>>> >>>>>> Ralph >>>>>> >>>>>> On Aug 4, 2014, at 7:30 AM, Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> +1 Remko Popma >>>>>> +1 Gary Gregory >>>>>> +1 Ralph Goers >>>>>> >>>>>> +1 (non-binding) Bruno Mahe >>>>>> >>>>>> The release vote passed with +3 binding, +1 non-binding. The release >>>>>> artifacts are all on my site: >>>>>> >>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~mattsicker/log4j/ >>>>>> >>>>>> We need a PMC to commit these to svn. >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Matt Sicker <[email protected]> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Matt Sicker <[email protected]> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Matt Sicker <[email protected]> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> Matt Sicker <[email protected] >>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Matt Sicker <[email protected] >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> >> >> > > > -- > Matt Sicker <[email protected] > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> >
