I just committed the artifacts for distribution. However, I don’t have the site zip file so I didn’t commit that.
You can go ahead and publish the site now. Ralph On Aug 4, 2014, at 8:05 PM, Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote: > Looks like Maven Central has it: > > http://search.maven.org/#search|ga|1|g%3A%22org.apache.logging.log4j%22%20AND%20v%3A%222.0.1%22 > > > On 4 August 2014 19:54, Remko Popma <[email protected]> wrote: > Well, lesson learned. No big problem IMO. (Resending as I forgot to > reply-all.) > > Sent from my iPhone > > On 2014/08/05, at 9:04, Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Well, good point. The sample jars come with the source code and javadoc >> jars. Well, I can't modify the deployment anymore as it's already moved from >> staging. :/ >> >> >> On 4 August 2014 18:35, Ralph Goers <[email protected]> wrote: >> Why would anyone want the sample jars? They would want the sample source to >> modify them for their own purposes. All the source, including the samples, >> is in the source distribution. >> >> Ralph >> >> On Aug 4, 2014, at 4:21 PM, Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> I didn't delete the samples. I thought projects normally published those, >>> too? I know that several other Apache projects do so at least. >>> >>> On Monday, 4 August 2014, Ralph Goers <[email protected]> wrote: >>> As I said, you should delete anything that would never be referenced in a >>> Maven project. This would include the distribution, samples and perf >>> sub-projects. >>> >>> Ralph >>> >>> On Aug 4, 2014, at 11:59 AM, Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> I can do the Nexus part now. I deleted the distribution directory. Should >>>> I also delete log4j-perf due to it being GPL'd? >>>> >>>> >>>> On 4 August 2014 13:47, Ralph Goers <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> The order of publishing the artifacts doesn’t really matter much - except >>>> you don’t really want the site going live until the artifacts are >>>> committed to svn. I always do the Nexus release first. I believe you >>>> have permission to do that. If not I am pretty sure I can do it even >>>> though you created it. >>>> >>>> Ralph >>>> >>>> On Aug 4, 2014, at 11:43 AM, Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> The steps said not to do that until after it was committed to the other >>>>> svn repo. I don't have rights to do any of that. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 4 August 2014 10:42, Ralph Goers <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> Also, do you have rights to publish the site? I can publish the >>>>> distribution artifacts when I get home tonight. I already have them when >>>>> I verified the release. >>>>> >>>>> Ralph >>>>> >>>>> On Aug 4, 2014, at 7:30 AM, Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> +1 Remko Popma >>>>>> +1 Gary Gregory >>>>>> +1 Ralph Goers >>>>>> >>>>>> +1 (non-binding) Bruno Mahe >>>>>> >>>>>> The release vote passed with +3 binding, +1 non-binding. The release >>>>>> artifacts are all on my site: >>>>>> >>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~mattsicker/log4j/ >>>>>> >>>>>> We need a PMC to commit these to svn. >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Matt Sicker <[email protected]> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Matt Sicker <[email protected]> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Matt Sicker <[email protected]> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Matt Sicker <[email protected]> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Matt Sicker <[email protected]> > > > > -- > Matt Sicker <[email protected]>
