So whenever we're ready to finish this, I am. I can't commit to that svn repo that's necessary to finish this before announcing.
On 5 August 2014 08:44, Remko Popma <[email protected]> wrote: > The web site is still 2.0. > > > On Tuesday, August 5, 2014, Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Looks like Maven Central has it: >> >> >> http://search.maven.org/#search|ga|1|g%3A%22org.apache.logging.log4j%22%20AND%20v%3A%222.0.1%22 >> <http://search.maven.org/#search%7Cga%7C1%7Cg%3A%22org.apache.logging.log4j%22%20AND%20v%3A%222.0.1%22> >> >> >> On 4 August 2014 19:54, Remko Popma <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Well, lesson learned. No big problem IMO. (Resending as I forgot to >>> reply-all.) >>> >>> Sent from my iPhone >>> >>> On 2014/08/05, at 9:04, Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Well, good point. The sample jars come with the source code and javadoc >>> jars. Well, I can't modify the deployment anymore as it's already moved >>> from staging. :/ >>> >>> >>> On 4 August 2014 18:35, Ralph Goers <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Why would anyone want the sample jars? They would want the sample >>>> source to modify them for their own purposes. All the source, including the >>>> samples, is in the source distribution. >>>> >>>> Ralph >>>> >>>> On Aug 4, 2014, at 4:21 PM, Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> I didn't delete the samples. I thought projects normally published >>>> those, too? I know that several other Apache projects do so at least. >>>> >>>> On Monday, 4 August 2014, Ralph Goers <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> As I said, you should delete anything that would never be referenced >>>>> in a Maven project. This would include the distribution, samples and perf >>>>> sub-projects. >>>>> >>>>> Ralph >>>>> >>>>> On Aug 4, 2014, at 11:59 AM, Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I can do the Nexus part now. I deleted the distribution directory. >>>>> Should I also delete log4j-perf due to it being GPL'd? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 4 August 2014 13:47, Ralph Goers <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> The order of publishing the artifacts doesn’t really matter much - >>>>>> except you don’t really want the site going live until the artifacts are >>>>>> committed to svn. I always do the Nexus release first. I believe you >>>>>> have >>>>>> permission to do that. If not I am pretty sure I can do it even though >>>>>> you >>>>>> created it. >>>>>> >>>>>> Ralph >>>>>> >>>>>> On Aug 4, 2014, at 11:43 AM, Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> The steps said not to do that until after it was committed to the >>>>>> other svn repo. I don't have rights to do any of that. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 4 August 2014 10:42, Ralph Goers <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Also, do you have rights to publish the site? I can publish the >>>>>>> distribution artifacts when I get home tonight. I already have them >>>>>>> when I >>>>>>> verified the release. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Ralph >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Aug 4, 2014, at 7:30 AM, Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> +1 Remko Popma >>>>>>> +1 Gary Gregory >>>>>>> +1 Ralph Goers >>>>>>> >>>>>>> +1 (non-binding) Bruno Mahe >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The release vote passed with +3 binding, +1 non-binding. The release >>>>>>> artifacts are all on my site: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~mattsicker/log4j/ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> We need a PMC to commit these to svn. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Matt Sicker <[email protected]> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Matt Sicker <[email protected]> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Matt Sicker <[email protected]> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Matt Sicker <[email protected]> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Matt Sicker <[email protected]> >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Matt Sicker <[email protected]> >> > -- Matt Sicker <[email protected]>
