Oh, I didn't find that part. Also, I wasn't sure which voting method this sort of vote might require. If that makes it +3 to switch to Git, then it looks like we can ask INFRA to help us out?
On 10 August 2014 14:51, Ralph Goers <[email protected]> wrote: > Matt, after reading our own guidelines I think your vote should count > since you initiated the vote. > > Sent from my iPad > > On Aug 10, 2014, at 12:41 PM, Ralph Goers <[email protected]> wrote: > > Does this really require 3 + 1 votes from PMC members? > > Sent from my iPad > > On Aug 10, 2014, at 8:27 AM, Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote: > > Votes cast: > > +1 Matt Sicker > +1 Scott Deboy > +1 Remko Popma > +0 Ralph Goers > -0 Gary Gregory > +1 Bruno Mahe > -0 Dominik Psenner > > There are no guidelines I found about which process this would follow, so > let's say it used the Lazy Consensus method. Then we have: > > +1 Scott > +1 Remko > +0 Ralph > -0 Gary > > Based on PMC votes, it looks like this doesn't pass for now. We'll be > sticking with Subversion. > > -- > Matt Sicker <[email protected]> > > -- Matt Sicker <[email protected]>
