We can ask infra to set up git-multimail: https://github.com/mhagger/git-multimail/blob/master/git-multimail/README
Sent from my iPhone > On 2014/08/11, at 15:56, Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote: > > I use them a lot, too. > > >> On 11 August 2014 01:17, Ralph Goers <[email protected]> wrote: >> The only concern I have is I don't believe the commit emails contain diffs. >> I use those a lot. >> >> Sent from my iPad >> >>> On Aug 10, 2014, at 2:25 PM, Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> For what it's worth, moving to Git helps increase contributions from places >>> like GitHub. Once we're migrated, we can have pull requests sent to the >>> mailing list. These emails contain instructions on how to pull them locally >>> as well as merge them to our own official repo in such a way to >>> automatically close the PR on GitHub as well. It works rather well over at >>> the Camel project. >>> >>> >>>> On 10 August 2014 16:19, Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> I filed a ticket with infra here: >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-8169 >>>> >>>> >>>>> On 10 August 2014 16:09, Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> Here's the ticket from back when Ant migrated: >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-7759 >>>>> >>>>> Looks like we can do the same. It'll be easier, too, since we' don't have >>>>> like six subprojects to work with as well. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> On 10 August 2014 15:56, Ralph Goers <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> I'm not sure what the process is. >>>>>> >>>>>> Sent from my iPad >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Aug 10, 2014, at 1:25 PM, Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Oh, I didn't find that part. Also, I wasn't sure which voting method >>>>>>> this sort of vote might require. If that makes it +3 to switch to Git, >>>>>>> then it looks like we can ask INFRA to help us out? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 10 August 2014 14:51, Ralph Goers <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>> Matt, after reading our own guidelines I think your vote should count >>>>>>>> since you initiated the vote. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Sent from my iPad >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Aug 10, 2014, at 12:41 PM, Ralph Goers <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Does this really require 3 + 1 votes from PMC members? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Sent from my iPad >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Aug 10, 2014, at 8:27 AM, Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Votes cast: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> +1 Matt Sicker >>>>>>>>>> +1 Scott Deboy >>>>>>>>>> +1 Remko Popma >>>>>>>>>> +0 Ralph Goers >>>>>>>>>> -0 Gary Gregory >>>>>>>>>> +1 Bruno Mahe >>>>>>>>>> -0 Dominik Psenner >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> There are no guidelines I found about which process this would >>>>>>>>>> follow, so let's say it used the Lazy Consensus method. Then we have: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> +1 Scott >>>>>>>>>> +1 Remko >>>>>>>>>> +0 Ralph >>>>>>>>>> -0 Gary >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Based on PMC votes, it looks like this doesn't pass for now. We'll >>>>>>>>>> be sticking with Subversion. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>> Matt Sicker <[email protected]> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Matt Sicker <[email protected]> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Matt Sicker <[email protected]> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Matt Sicker <[email protected]> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Matt Sicker <[email protected]> > > > > -- > Matt Sicker <[email protected]>
