The only concern I have is I don't believe the commit emails contain diffs. I 
use those a lot.

Sent from my iPad

> On Aug 10, 2014, at 2:25 PM, Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> For what it's worth, moving to Git helps increase contributions from places 
> like GitHub. Once we're migrated, we can have pull requests sent to the 
> mailing list. These emails contain instructions on how to pull them locally 
> as well as merge them to our own official repo in such a way to automatically 
> close the PR on GitHub as well. It works rather well over at the Camel 
> project.
> 
> 
>> On 10 August 2014 16:19, Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I filed a ticket with infra here: 
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-8169
>> 
>> 
>>> On 10 August 2014 16:09, Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Here's the ticket from back when Ant migrated:
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-7759
>>> 
>>> Looks like we can do the same. It'll be easier, too, since we' don't have 
>>> like six subprojects to work with as well.
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On 10 August 2014 15:56, Ralph Goers <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> I'm not sure what the process is. 
>>>> 
>>>> Sent from my iPad
>>>> 
>>>>> On Aug 10, 2014, at 1:25 PM, Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Oh, I didn't find that part. Also, I wasn't sure which voting method this 
>>>>> sort of vote might require. If that makes it +3 to switch to Git, then it 
>>>>> looks like we can ask INFRA to help us out?
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On 10 August 2014 14:51, Ralph Goers <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>> Matt, after reading our own guidelines I think your vote should count 
>>>>>> since you initiated the vote.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Sent from my iPad
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Aug 10, 2014, at 12:41 PM, Ralph Goers <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Does this really require 3 + 1 votes from PMC members?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Sent from my iPad
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Aug 10, 2014, at 8:27 AM, Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Votes cast:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> +1 Matt Sicker
>>>>>>>> +1 Scott Deboy
>>>>>>>> +1 Remko Popma
>>>>>>>> +0 Ralph Goers
>>>>>>>> -0 Gary Gregory
>>>>>>>> +1 Bruno Mahe
>>>>>>>> -0 Dominik Psenner
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> There are no guidelines I found about which process this would follow, 
>>>>>>>> so let's say it used the Lazy Consensus method. Then we have:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> +1 Scott
>>>>>>>> +1 Remko
>>>>>>>> +0 Ralph
>>>>>>>> -0 Gary
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Based on PMC votes, it looks like this doesn't pass for now. We'll be 
>>>>>>>> sticking with Subversion.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>>> Matt Sicker <[email protected]>
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> Matt Sicker <[email protected]>
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> Matt Sicker <[email protected]>
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Matt Sicker <[email protected]>
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Matt Sicker <[email protected]>

Reply via email to