I do not think it matters from the Commons POV. I am the Commons PMC Chair FYI. Commons as a community can think and do what it wants with Commons Logging. What I am more concerned about is if, we, the Log4j Community can say with confidence "Log4j 2 is so good that we consider Commons Logging obsolete because A, B and C".
Gary On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 5:44 PM, Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote: > Have you asked this on the commons mailing list? > > > On 20 August 2014 09:46, Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I'd certainly say so. Commons Logging doesn't have parameterized messages >> or markers; that's a pretty big feature at this point. >> >> >> On 20 August 2014 08:42, Gary Gregory <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi All, >>> >>> I'd like to say that Log4j 2 deprecates Apache Commons Logging, but it >>> feels like a stretch. >>> >>> Thoughts? >>> >>> Gary >>> >>> -- >>> E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected] >>> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition >>> <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/> >>> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/> >>> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/> >>> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com >>> Home: http://garygregory.com/ >>> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Matt Sicker <[email protected]> >> > > > > -- > Matt Sicker <[email protected]> > -- E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected] Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com Home: http://garygregory.com/ Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
