In my opinion its surely obsolete, but where is the point saying it? Do you want to add a statement on the website?
On Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 1:08 AM, Gary Gregory <[email protected]> wrote: > I do not think it matters from the Commons POV. I am the Commons PMC Chair > FYI. Commons as a community can think and do what it wants with Commons > Logging. What I am more concerned about is if, we, the Log4j Community can > say with confidence "Log4j 2 is so good that we consider Commons Logging > obsolete because A, B and C". > > Gary > > > On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 5:44 PM, Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Have you asked this on the commons mailing list? >> >> >> On 20 August 2014 09:46, Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> I'd certainly say so. Commons Logging doesn't have parameterized messages >>> or markers; that's a pretty big feature at this point. >>> >>> >>> On 20 August 2014 08:42, Gary Gregory <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi All, >>>> >>>> I'd like to say that Log4j 2 deprecates Apache Commons Logging, but it >>>> feels like a stretch. >>>> >>>> Thoughts? >>>> >>>> Gary >>>> >>>> -- >>>> E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected] >>>> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition >>>> JUnit in Action, Second Edition >>>> Spring Batch in Action >>>> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com >>>> Home: http://garygregory.com/ >>>> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Matt Sicker <[email protected]> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Matt Sicker <[email protected]> > > > > > -- > E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected] > Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition > JUnit in Action, Second Edition > Spring Batch in Action > Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com > Home: http://garygregory.com/ > Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory -- http://www.grobmeier.de https://www.timeandbill.de --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
