I'm working on the constructors thing. Make the API a bit nicer.

On 3 September 2014 12:19, Gary Gregory <[email protected]> wrote:

> Matt, feel free to whack on iostreams, I'm done in there for today.
>
> Gary
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 12:13 PM, Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> That's still a possibility, but I'm still not sold on it.
>>
>>
>> On 3 September 2014 11:04, Gary Gregory <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Then what about matching the module name? log4j-io?
>>>
>>> Gary
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 9:17 AM, Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I'll take a look at the constructors and such. I think this is a prime
>>>> candidate for the builder pattern.
>>>>
>>>> Also, I renamed the o.a.l.l.streams package to o.a.l.l.io to match the
>>>> java.io package that this module emulates. I think it's a pretty neat
>>>> package name now (especially with the foo.io domain name fad going
>>>> on), but if there are objections, we can always name it something else.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 2 September 2014 23:59, Gary Gregory <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 12:32 AM, Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> They almost seem like SPI classes in a sense of how the JDK
>>>>>> categorizes things sometimes. I wouldn't mind flattening them. They're 
>>>>>> all
>>>>>> of equal importance.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Done.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm going to sleep now (1am here) but one thing you can look at Matt
>>>>> (or anyone) is how many of all the ctors we really need. There are quite a
>>>>> few.
>>>>>
>>>>> Gary
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2 September 2014 09:54, Gary Gregory <[email protected]>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Any thoughts on folding the two classes in
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> org.apache.logging.log4j.streams.util
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> back into:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> org.apache.logging.log4j.streams
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> They are both hard wired to an ExtendedLogger.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I could see those being a Core or API util package if they are to be
>>>>>>> in one.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thoughts?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Gary
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected]
>>>>>>> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition
>>>>>>> <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
>>>>>>> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
>>>>>>> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
>>>>>>> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
>>>>>>> Home: http://garygregory.com/
>>>>>>> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Matt Sicker <[email protected]>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected]
>>>>> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition
>>>>> <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
>>>>> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
>>>>> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
>>>>> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
>>>>> Home: http://garygregory.com/
>>>>> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Matt Sicker <[email protected]>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected]
>>> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition
>>> <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
>>> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
>>> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
>>> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
>>> Home: http://garygregory.com/
>>> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Matt Sicker <[email protected]>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected]
> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition
> <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
> Home: http://garygregory.com/
> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
>



-- 
Matt Sicker <[email protected]>

Reply via email to