Updated the test. And as for the class name, something short would be nice.


On 4 September 2014 12:23, Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote:

> Whoops, I'll update that test. I didn't notice it.
>
>
> On 4 September 2014 12:18, Gary Gregory <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> It looks like you did not update or push
>> org.apache.logging.log4j.io.LoggerPrintWriterJdbcH2Test
>>
>> Gary
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 1:02 PM, Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Pushed the great refactoring. Turned out better than expected!
>>>
>>>
>>> On 3 September 2014 20:58, Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I'm finding that there may be many different ways to expose this API
>>>> better than with constructors, and it's tough to choose a proper way to do
>>>> it. Each class can have its own builder (very repetitive; can't even
>>>> abstract it due to method chaining), or what I'm thinking might be useful
>>>> is a more generic builder system that creates the appropriate class based
>>>> on how it's configured. I'd like to take that approach, the java.io
>>>> API really shows its age with the huge lack of interfaces and other more
>>>> "modern" Java idioms. Then again, even Java 1.4 screwed up the logging API,
>>>> so I'm not surprised. ;)
>>>>
>>>> I'm going to have more time to work on things over the next two days as
>>>> I'm on "staycation" with not much planned. Should have something neat by
>>>> the weekend!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 3 September 2014 17:44, Gary Gregory <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Cool! I hope it's coming along nicely :-)
>>>>>
>>>>> Gary
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 3:16 PM, Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm working on the constructors thing. Make the API a bit nicer.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 3 September 2014 12:19, Gary Gregory <[email protected]>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Matt, feel free to whack on iostreams, I'm done in there for today.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Gary
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 12:13 PM, Matt Sicker <[email protected]>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> That's still a possibility, but I'm still not sold on it.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 3 September 2014 11:04, Gary Gregory <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Then what about matching the module name? log4j-io?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Gary
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 9:17 AM, Matt Sicker <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I'll take a look at the constructors and such. I think this is a
>>>>>>>>>> prime candidate for the builder pattern.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Also, I renamed the o.a.l.l.streams package to o.a.l.l.io to
>>>>>>>>>> match the java.io package that this module emulates. I think
>>>>>>>>>> it's a pretty neat package name now (especially with the foo.io
>>>>>>>>>> domain name fad going on), but if there are objections, we can 
>>>>>>>>>> always name
>>>>>>>>>> it something else.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 2 September 2014 23:59, Gary Gregory <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 12:32 AM, Matt Sicker <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> They almost seem like SPI classes in a sense of how the JDK
>>>>>>>>>>>> categorizes things sometimes. I wouldn't mind flattening them. 
>>>>>>>>>>>> They're all
>>>>>>>>>>>> of equal importance.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Done.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I'm going to sleep now (1am here) but one thing you can look at
>>>>>>>>>>> Matt (or anyone) is how many of all the ctors we really need. There 
>>>>>>>>>>> are
>>>>>>>>>>> quite a few.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Gary
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2 September 2014 09:54, Gary Gregory <[email protected]
>>>>>>>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Any thoughts on folding the two classes in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.logging.log4j.streams.util
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> back into:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.logging.log4j.streams
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> They are both hard wired to an ExtendedLogger.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I could see those being a Core or API util package if they are
>>>>>>>>>>>>> to be in one.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thoughts?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gary
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>> E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> JUnit in Action, Second Edition
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Home: http://garygregory.com/
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>> Matt Sicker <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>>> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition
>>>>>>>>>>> <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
>>>>>>>>>>> JUnit in Action, Second Edition
>>>>>>>>>>> <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
>>>>>>>>>>> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
>>>>>>>>>>> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
>>>>>>>>>>> Home: http://garygregory.com/
>>>>>>>>>>> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> Matt Sicker <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected]
>>>>>>>>> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition
>>>>>>>>> <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
>>>>>>>>> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
>>>>>>>>> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
>>>>>>>>> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
>>>>>>>>> Home: http://garygregory.com/
>>>>>>>>> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Matt Sicker <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected]
>>>>>>> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition
>>>>>>> <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
>>>>>>> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
>>>>>>> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
>>>>>>> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
>>>>>>> Home: http://garygregory.com/
>>>>>>> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Matt Sicker <[email protected]>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected]
>>>>> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition
>>>>> <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
>>>>> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
>>>>> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
>>>>> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
>>>>> Home: http://garygregory.com/
>>>>> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Matt Sicker <[email protected]>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Matt Sicker <[email protected]>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected]
>> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition
>> <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
>> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
>> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
>> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
>> Home: http://garygregory.com/
>> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Matt Sicker <[email protected]>
>



-- 
Matt Sicker <[email protected]>

Reply via email to