I can’t do a release this weekend and would really like 
traceEntry(gson->toJson(request)) and traceExit(gson->toJson(response)) or 
their Message variations to work in the next release. 

Ralph

> On Feb 21, 2016, at 4:48 AM, Remko Popma <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> I am comfortable with the fatter release, unless there is urgency to quickly 
> release one of the bug fixes.
> 
> On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 5:34 PM, Gary Gregory <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> Forget the release number for a minute and just consider this: Do we want to 
> release without the 'radical' ;-) new stuff (flow APIs, low/no-GC) ASAP 
> because we have a lot of changes already. Or, are we more comfortable with a 
> fatter release later, with more changes, which may feel less stable and more 
> disruptive depending on your POV and taste for change.
> 
> This is all mod Ralph's availability as RM unless someone else wants to pick 
> up the task.
> 
> Gary
> 
> On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 12:20 AM, Matt Sicker <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> That does sound like a 2.5.1 release. I'd be fine with a 2.5.1 release. If 
> it's already changed enough to warrant 2.6 semantically, we might as well 
> finish our other 2.6 work first.
> 
> On 21 February 2016 at 02:11, Remko Popma <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> Depending on whether we can get consensus on a Logger API without varargs, I 
> estimate I am about a week away from finishing the code changes for the 
> GC-free epic. I would then want to do performance tests and do a write-up, 
> which is another week or two.
> 
> I would prefer including this work in the 2.6 release, but if the consensus 
> is to do a release soon without the GC-free epic I won't object.
> -Remko
> 
> On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 5:07 PM, Remko Popma <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> Without the flow logging API changes and gc-free stuff it would just be a 
> 2.5.1 release, no?
> 
> On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 5:02 PM, Gary Gregory <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> FWIW: From a practical POV, one way to do this would be to branch master into 
> a 2.6 branch and prune the branch of the new stuff.
> 
> Gary
> 
> On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 10:22 PM, Gary Gregory <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> Hi All:
> 
> Since we have a nice stack of changes already, I would like for us to 
> consider the following:
> 
> Release 2.6 without the new flow tracing APIs and without the new low/no-GC 
> code (ByteBufferDestination and all).
> 
> Then we can make the next release have two themes: flow tracing and no/low GC.
> 
> This would avoid too big a 2.6 release in relation to 2.5.
> 
> Thoughts?
> 
> Gary
> 
> -- 
> E-Mail: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> | 
> [email protected]  <mailto:[email protected]>
> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition 
> <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com <http://garygregory.wordpress.com/> 
> Home: http://garygregory.com/ <http://garygregory.com/>
> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory <http://twitter.com/GaryGregory>
> 
> 
> -- 
> E-Mail: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> | 
> [email protected]  <mailto:[email protected]>
> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition 
> <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com <http://garygregory.wordpress.com/> 
> Home: http://garygregory.com/ <http://garygregory.com/>
> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory <http://twitter.com/GaryGregory>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Matt Sicker <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> E-Mail: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> | 
> [email protected]  <mailto:[email protected]>
> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition 
> <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com <http://garygregory.wordpress.com/> 
> Home: http://garygregory.com/ <http://garygregory.com/>
> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory <http://twitter.com/GaryGregory>

Reply via email to