:-)

On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 3:51 AM, Gary Gregory <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Then it's settled, "Chubby 2.6" it is :-P
>
> Thank you,
> Gary
>
> On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 9:33 AM, Ralph Goers <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> I can’t do a release this weekend and would really like
>> traceEntry(gson->toJson(request)) and traceExit(gson->toJson(response)) or
>> their Message variations to work in the next release.
>>
>> Ralph
>>
>> On Feb 21, 2016, at 4:48 AM, Remko Popma <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> I am comfortable with the fatter release, unless there is urgency to
>> quickly release one of the bug fixes.
>>
>> On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 5:34 PM, Gary Gregory <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Forget the release number for a minute and just consider this: Do we
>>> want to release without the 'radical' ;-) new stuff (flow APIs, low/no-GC)
>>> ASAP because we have a lot of changes already. Or, are we more comfortable
>>> with a fatter release later, with more changes, which may feel less stable
>>> and more disruptive depending on your POV and taste for change.
>>>
>>> This is all mod Ralph's availability as RM unless someone else wants to
>>> pick up the task.
>>>
>>> Gary
>>>
>>> On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 12:20 AM, Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> That does sound like a 2.5.1 release. I'd be fine with a 2.5.1 release.
>>>> If it's already changed enough to warrant 2.6 semantically, we might as
>>>> well finish our other 2.6 work first.
>>>>
>>>> On 21 February 2016 at 02:11, Remko Popma <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Depending on whether we can get consensus on a Logger API without
>>>>> varargs, I estimate I am about a week away from finishing the code changes
>>>>> for the GC-free epic. I would then want to do performance tests and do a
>>>>> write-up, which is another week or two.
>>>>>
>>>>> I would prefer including this work in the 2.6 release, but if the
>>>>> consensus is to do a release soon without the GC-free epic I won't object.
>>>>> -Remko
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 5:07 PM, Remko Popma <[email protected]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Without the flow logging API changes and gc-free stuff it would just
>>>>>> be a 2.5.1 release, no?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 5:02 PM, Gary Gregory <[email protected]
>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> FWIW: From a practical POV, one way to do this would be to branch
>>>>>>> master into a 2.6 branch and prune the branch of the new stuff.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Gary
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 10:22 PM, Gary Gregory <
>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi All:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Since we have a nice stack of changes already, I would like for us
>>>>>>>> to consider the following:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Release 2.6 without the new flow tracing APIs and without the new
>>>>>>>> low/no-GC code (ByteBufferDestination and all).
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Then we can make the next release have two themes: flow tracing and
>>>>>>>> no/low GC.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This would avoid too big a 2.6 release in relation to 2.5.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thoughts?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Gary
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected]
>>>>>>>> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition
>>>>>>>> <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
>>>>>>>> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
>>>>>>>> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
>>>>>>>> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
>>>>>>>> Home: http://garygregory.com/
>>>>>>>> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected]
>>>>>>> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition
>>>>>>> <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
>>>>>>> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
>>>>>>> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
>>>>>>> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
>>>>>>> Home: http://garygregory.com/
>>>>>>> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Matt Sicker <[email protected]>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected]
>>> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition
>>> <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
>>> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
>>> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
>>> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
>>> Home: http://garygregory.com/
>>> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected]
> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition
> <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
> Home: http://garygregory.com/
> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
>

Reply via email to