Sounds good to me, too.

On 21 February 2016 at 12:57, Remko Popma <[email protected]> wrote:

> :-)
>
> On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 3:51 AM, Gary Gregory <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> Then it's settled, "Chubby 2.6" it is :-P
>>
>> Thank you,
>> Gary
>>
>> On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 9:33 AM, Ralph Goers <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I can’t do a release this weekend and would really like
>>> traceEntry(gson->toJson(request)) and traceExit(gson->toJson(response)) or
>>> their Message variations to work in the next release.
>>>
>>> Ralph
>>>
>>> On Feb 21, 2016, at 4:48 AM, Remko Popma <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> I am comfortable with the fatter release, unless there is urgency to
>>> quickly release one of the bug fixes.
>>>
>>> On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 5:34 PM, Gary Gregory <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Forget the release number for a minute and just consider this: Do we
>>>> want to release without the 'radical' ;-) new stuff (flow APIs, low/no-GC)
>>>> ASAP because we have a lot of changes already. Or, are we more comfortable
>>>> with a fatter release later, with more changes, which may feel less stable
>>>> and more disruptive depending on your POV and taste for change.
>>>>
>>>> This is all mod Ralph's availability as RM unless someone else wants to
>>>> pick up the task.
>>>>
>>>> Gary
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 12:20 AM, Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> That does sound like a 2.5.1 release. I'd be fine with a 2.5.1
>>>>> release. If it's already changed enough to warrant 2.6 semantically, we
>>>>> might as well finish our other 2.6 work first.
>>>>>
>>>>> On 21 February 2016 at 02:11, Remko Popma <[email protected]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Depending on whether we can get consensus on a Logger API without
>>>>>> varargs, I estimate I am about a week away from finishing the code 
>>>>>> changes
>>>>>> for the GC-free epic. I would then want to do performance tests and do a
>>>>>> write-up, which is another week or two.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I would prefer including this work in the 2.6 release, but if the
>>>>>> consensus is to do a release soon without the GC-free epic I won't 
>>>>>> object.
>>>>>> -Remko
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 5:07 PM, Remko Popma <[email protected]>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Without the flow logging API changes and gc-free stuff it would just
>>>>>>> be a 2.5.1 release, no?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 5:02 PM, Gary Gregory <
>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> FWIW: From a practical POV, one way to do this would be to branch
>>>>>>>> master into a 2.6 branch and prune the branch of the new stuff.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Gary
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 10:22 PM, Gary Gregory <
>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi All:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Since we have a nice stack of changes already, I would like for us
>>>>>>>>> to consider the following:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Release 2.6 without the new flow tracing APIs and without the new
>>>>>>>>> low/no-GC code (ByteBufferDestination and all).
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Then we can make the next release have two themes: flow tracing
>>>>>>>>> and no/low GC.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> This would avoid too big a 2.6 release in relation to 2.5.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thoughts?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Gary
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected]
>>>>>>>>> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition
>>>>>>>>> <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
>>>>>>>>> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
>>>>>>>>> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
>>>>>>>>> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
>>>>>>>>> Home: http://garygregory.com/
>>>>>>>>> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected]
>>>>>>>> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition
>>>>>>>> <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
>>>>>>>> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
>>>>>>>> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
>>>>>>>> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
>>>>>>>> Home: http://garygregory.com/
>>>>>>>> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Matt Sicker <[email protected]>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected]
>>>> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition
>>>> <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
>>>> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
>>>> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
>>>> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
>>>> Home: http://garygregory.com/
>>>> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected]
>> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition
>> <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
>> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
>> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
>> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
>> Home: http://garygregory.com/
>> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
>>
>
>


-- 
Matt Sicker <[email protected]>

Reply via email to