+1 for 2.6.1. Plus, we have website fixes, too. On 1 June 2016 at 18:01, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Jun 1, 2016 2:57 PM, "Ralph Goers" <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> wrote: > > > > I just fixed LOGJ2-1402. I would also like to modify RenameAction to > use java.nio.file to rename and delete so that we can get better logging > out of them. Ultimately, I want to address LOG4J2-1180 to have the rolling > file appender write directly into the “rollover files” as this is > apparently the only real fix for Windows. However, I don’t want to do that > in a point release. > > > > LOG4J2-1180 was updated today and it seems the support for having > Loggers stored by their message factory is not working correctly. Gary > apparently is also experiencing this problem. > > > > I would like to see if we can fix these three items this week and do > another release this weekend. If there are any other bugs that can be > addressed by then I’m ok with that. > > +1, 1180 is a blocker for me to bring in 2.6 at work. I might get to it > late tonight (PST). > > Gary > > > > Thoughts? > > > > Ralph > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org > > > -- Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com>
