+1 Sounds reasonable On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 3:22 AM, Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 for 2.6.1. Plus, we have website fixes, too. > > On 1 June 2016 at 18:01, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> On Jun 1, 2016 2:57 PM, "Ralph Goers" <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> wrote: >> > >> > I just fixed LOGJ2-1402. I would also like to modify RenameAction to >> use java.nio.file to rename and delete so that we can get better logging >> out of them. Ultimately, I want to address LOG4J2-1180 to have the rolling >> file appender write directly into the “rollover files” as this is >> apparently the only real fix for Windows. However, I don’t want to do that >> in a point release. >> > >> > LOG4J2-1180 was updated today and it seems the support for having >> Loggers stored by their message factory is not working correctly. Gary >> apparently is also experiencing this problem. >> > >> > I would like to see if we can fix these three items this week and do >> another release this weekend. If there are any other bugs that can be >> addressed by then I’m ok with that. >> >> +1, 1180 is a blocker for me to bring in 2.6 at work. I might get to it >> late tonight (PST). >> >> Gary >> > >> > Thoughts? >> > >> > Ralph >> > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org >> > For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org >> > >> > > > > -- > Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> > -- [image: MagineTV] *Mikael Ståldal* Senior software developer *Magine TV* mikael.stal...@magine.com Grev Turegatan 3 | 114 46 Stockholm, Sweden | www.magine.com Privileged and/or Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such a person), you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply email.
