Ok, good points all around. The current release feels like a 2.6.2 but I do
not have a good feel for how important the new console appender direct mode
is. If it is a real wiz bang feature, the 2.7 would be ok.

Gary
On Jun 18, 2016 3:57 PM, "Remko Popma" <[email protected]> wrote:

> I would also like to do a release soon, but what we have so far "feels"
> more like a bugfix release. I don't think we have enough new functionality
> yet to call it 2.7...
>
> If the MessageFactory2 return type change is key, then I would not mind
> taking it out temporarily for 2.6.2, and immediately adding it back for the
> next release. If I'm not mistaken Mikael needs this for the Scala module
> but otherwise there's no urgent need for this change.
>
> The direct option is technically a new feature but I still think 2.6.2
> characterizes better what we have so far.
>
> Remko
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On 2016/06/19, at 6:11, Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Oh, in that case, yeah, I'd agree that this is semantically 2.7 at this
> point.
>
> On 18 June 2016 at 16:08, Gary Gregory <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 1:59 PM, Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> If we do 2.7 instead of 2.6.2, then we may want to put more in than what
>>> exists.
>>>
>>
>> But this is the opposite of what my intention is here. I am asking what
>> is the proper semver appropriate _label_ we want to put on our next release
>> "now", which really feels to me like we need and is ready.
>>
>>
>>> Of course, we could always just RERO.
>>>
>>
>> I am +1 to RERO in general.
>>
>> Gary
>>
>> Gary
>>
>>>
>>> On 18 June 2016 at 15:44, Gary Gregory <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi All,
>>>>
>>>> Do the following:
>>>>
>>>>       <action issue="LOG4J2-1395" dev="mikes" type="add">
>>>>         Add "direct" option to ConsoleAppender for increased
>>>> performance.
>>>>       </action>
>>>>       <action issue="LOG4J2-1418" dev="mikes" type="fix">
>>>>         Provide MessageFactory2 to custom Logger implementations.
>>>>       </action>
>>>>
>>>> constitute enough of new feature to justify labeling the next release
>>>> 2.7 as opposed to 2.6.2; currently all other changes fall into the fix or
>>>> update category.
>>>>
>>>> Gary
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected]
>>>> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition
>>>> <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
>>>> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
>>>> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
>>>> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
>>>> Home: http://garygregory.com/
>>>> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Matt Sicker <[email protected]>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected]
>> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition
>> <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
>> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
>> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
>> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
>> Home: http://garygregory.com/
>> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Matt Sicker <[email protected]>
>
>

Reply via email to